High turnout as Nepal voters defy bombing, threats



By Ammu Kannampilly (AFP) – 9 hours ago

Kathmandu — Millions of Nepalis defied low expectations and threats of violence to vote Tuesday in elections seen as crucial in stabilising the country and breaking its political deadlock seven years after a civil war ended.

A bombing in the capital Kathmandu early Tuesday injured three children, but the explosion and a campaign of intimidation by a hardline Maoist splinter group did not prevent a high turnout, according to election officials.

Chief Election Commissioner Neel Kantha Uprety told a press conference late Tuesday that preliminary figures showed a 70 percent turnout.

At this level it would be higher than the 63.29 percent turnout recorded during the country’s first post-war elections in 2008, when it voted for a constituent assembly tasked with writing a new constitution.

“Voters have given their decision and it clearly points towards a constitution. I hope this is the last election for a constituent assembly in Nepal,” Uprety said.

Since 2008, five prime ministers have served brief terms, the country had no leader for long periods, and the 601-member assembly collapsed in May 2012 after failing to complete the peace process.

“My vote is for the future of youngsters and the new generations,” 101-year-old voter Lal Bahadur Rai told AFP in a phone interview from a polling station in northeastern Sankhuwasabha district.

Many analysts had judged the national mood to be downbeat as threats of violence and intimidation added to years of political infighting and drift.

Hopes of political unity to complete the peace process were dashed when a 33-party alliance, led by the splinter Communist Party of Nepal-Maoist (CPN-M), announced it would boycott polls and intimidate voters.

In recent days, protestors have torched vehicles and hurled explosives at traffic, leading to more than 360 arrests and one death.

In Kathmandu, a crude bomb explosion in a middle-class residential neighbourhood was the only major violent incident amid a security crackdown which saw 50,000 soldiers and 140,000 police deployed.

“I was passing by when I saw three children lying on the ground, crying for help,” 28-year-old eyewitness Saroj Maharjan told AFP at the scene.

“One of the children, whose face was covered in blood, fainted in my arms as I carried him to a nearby hospital,” he added.

Home ministry spokesman Shankar Koirala told reporters late Tuesday: “25 people were injured in election-related clashes across the country”.

The Maoist party, led by Pushpa Kamal Dahal, known better by the nom-de-guerre Prachanda, swept the first constituent assembly polls in 2008, two years after signing a peace deal.

Prachanda, the former rebel leader whose lavish lifestyle has alienated many core supporters, voted in the southern district of Chitwan in the morning wearing a shirt and Western-style black suit.

Logistical headache

Organising the election has been a logistical headache in a country home to eight of the world’s 14 highest mountains, requiring helicopters, horses and porters to deliver ballot boxes to remote areas.

“Some of the voters have trekked for five hours to reach here. They include elderly as well as young first-time voters,” Gitachari Acharya, an official at the nearest polling station to Mount Everest, told AFP.

Nepal’s political deadlock in the last five years has had a severe impact on the economy, with annual GDP growth tumbling from 6.1 percent in 2008 to 4.6 percent last year, World Bank figures show.

With 39 percent of the country aged between 16 and 40, according to government data, jobs are a major issue for young first-time voters like Urmila Maharjan.

The 22-year-old Kathmandu-based student told AFP she hoped “the new assembly will address issues like unemployment”.

Voters at one central Kathmandu polling station applauded and chanted “victory to Nepal” as election officials packed up ballot boxes.

More than 100 parties, including three major ones — the Unified Marxist-Leninist, the Nepali Congress and the Maoists — are fielding candidates for the constituent assembly, which will also serve as a parliament.

The anti-poll alliance had said the vote could not be held under the interim administration headed by the Supreme Court chief justice and wanted elections to be postponed until a cross-party government was put in place.

“Had the anti-poll groups organised peaceful protests, they could have questioned the legitimacy of the elections,” Akhilesh Upadhyay, editor in chief of The Kathmandu Post, told AFP.

“How can they gain political traction while even children have been brutally attacked?”

Election officials said the counting of votes would begin at midnight and preliminary results would emerge within three days.

Full results will be announced in about ten days, the chief election commissioner said.


6 Responses to “High turnout as Nepal voters defy bombing, threats”

  1. 1 informally yours

    What struck me here is how little the term Maoist and Marxist Leninist mean as used for the different descriptors of the factions and parties of Nepal as it moves from monarchical delusion and mass-murder to democratic norms.

    I am with whoever is with the masses, and I think Prachanda’s mob are still following that mass line approach. Who ever started the bombing is all wrong.

    A Nepali elector said to the world that he wished “victory to Nepal” and I think victory lies in the further development of the Assembly and Constitutional democratic foundations.

    I also noted (with a raised brow) the criticism against Prachanda in the accusations of “lavish” lifestyle, and his western-style “black suit wearing”.

    I’m wary of these kind of comments because I think they often indicate chauvinism, rather than a valid line of criticism. It would be a different matter if the criticism was something like “we’ve looked at the accounts and Prachanda spends millions on French champagne while the people go hungry”, at any rate outlining the extravagances that seem in/appropriate for someone who is functioning as some sort of head of a country. Anyway, I will be giving Prachanda the benefit of any doubt until proven unworthy of having it.

  2. 2 Steve Owens
  3. 3 Steve Owens

    Generally Maoists and/or Marxist leninists have argued for the opposite of what Prachanda is currently doing.

  4. 4 Steve Owens
  5. 5 Byork

    Steve, I don’t think Marxist-Leninists have ever opposed the revolutionary overthrow of an ancien regime, as happened by armed force and peoples struggle in Nepal. Prachanda’s view that Nepal needs bourgeois democracy now is consistent with the theory of revolution by stages. Not even vaguely similar to Kruschev’s ‘peaceful road to socialism’ line which denied the need for revolution in the first place. There was a revolution in Nepal and now there is a parliamentary democracy…

  6. 6 steve owens

    Hi Barry
    I agree with you that Marxist Leninist have never opposed the revolutionary overthrow of an ancient regimen
    I agree with you that Prachanda’s view is that Nepal needs bourgeois democracy.
    However Marxism Leninism has sought to leap over the stage of bourgeois democracy.
    No Marxist Leninist Ive heard of argued for parliamentary elections when Lenin , Mao or Pol Pot came to power
    Marxist Leninists Ive met have always argued that bourgeois democracy is but a mask for the real class dictatorship
    Im supportive of Prachandas turn to peaceful politics but I see why Maoists in Nepal and Maoists in India who are rejecting elections and continuing with the principles of peoples war might see him as deviating from Marxism Leninism.

Leave a Reply